Prediction of Geraldine Beamish vs Phoebe Watson Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
G. Beamish vs P. Watson

Geraldine Beamish

GBR

1

Win

Played

2

Win

140

Age

127

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Phoebe Watson

GBR

1

Win

Played

2

Win

140

Age

127

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Beamish 1 - 2 Watson

They have played 9 sets in total, with Geraldine Beamish winning 5 and Phoebe Watson winning 4. The last match between Phoebe Watson and Geraldine Beamish was at the Melbury, 14-04-1930, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory W/O.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Beamish	1
Watson	2

Last 6 H2H Matches:

(R4) Melbury(04-14-30)

Stats

Phoebe Watson

Geraldine Beamish

(SF) Eastbourne(09-05-27)

Stats

Phoebe Watson

Geraldine Beamish

(SF) Hastings(08-24-25)

Stats

Phoebe Watson

Geraldine Beamish

G. Beamish vs P. Watson H2H Profile

G. Beamish	Stats	P. Watson
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
77.85% (608-173)	Career Total W/L	83.68% (282-55)
0	Clay	1
1	Grass	1
1	Total H2H Matches	2
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

G. Beamish vs P. Watson Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Geraldine Beamish has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Phoebe Watson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Geraldine Beamish, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Phoebe Watson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Geraldine Beamish has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Phoebe Watson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Geraldine Beamish has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Phoebe Watson winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Geraldine Beamish has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 86% (W/L 87/14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 218/67). Phoebe Watson has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 86% (W/L 83/11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 80% (W/L 67/17).
Player level: In the last year, Geraldine Beamish has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Phoebe Watson has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Geraldine Beamish winning 2 times and Phoebe Watson being victorious 2 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Geraldine Beamish winning 5 and Phoebe Watson winning 4.
The last match between Geraldine Beamish and Phoebe Watson was at the Melbury, 14-04-1930, Round: R4, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory W/O.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Geraldine Beamish has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Phoebe Watson has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Geraldine Beamish has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Phoebe Watson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Geraldine Beamish has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Phoebe Watson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Geraldine Beamish vs Phoebe Watson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

G. Beamish vs P. Watson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

G. Beamish	Stats	P. Watson
2	H2H Matches Won	2
5	Sets Won	4
45	Games Won	38
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (2/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (2/4)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
67% (2/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
33% (1/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	33% (1/3)

Recent Performance Stats

G. Beamish Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Queens Club Indoors - 16-10-1933
R3 Ermyntrude HarveyE. Harvey	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Felixstowe East England - 01-08-1933
F Lucy BondL. Bond	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
London Indoors - 10-10-1932
R3 Peggy Scriven VivianP. Scriven	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Cirencester - 12-09-1932
F Phyllis WhitleyP. Whitley	W	8-6 6-3	Stats
East Grinstead - 18-07-1932
F Elizabeth MacreadyE. Macready	L	4-6 6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

P. Watson Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Warwick - 11-07-1932
F Betty BoasB. Boas	W	6-4 6-0	Stats
Wolverhampton - 31-07-1931
F Jackie McalpineJ. Mcalpine	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
Buenos Aires - 09-11-1930
SF Monica RickettsM. Ricketts	W	6-0 6-2	Stats
F Lili De AlvarezL. De	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Buenos Aires Test Match - 25-10-1930
Robin Maria Elena De MossM. Elena	W	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

G. Beamish vs P. Watson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

G. Beamish	Stats	P. Watson
77.85% (608/173)	YTD Win/Loss	83.68% (282/55)
76.83% (1240/374)	Sets Win/Loss	81.49% (559/127)
65.89% (8782/4546)	Games Win/Loss	66.58% (3764/1889)
76.49% (218/67)	Clay Win/Loss	79.76% (67/17)
75.93% (41/13)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
76.83% (262/79)	Grass Win/Loss	83.02% (132/27)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
62.86% (22/13)	Slam W/L	64.86% (24/13)
0.00% (0/1)	Cups W/L	50.00% (3/3)
78% (587/749)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	84% (270/320)
44% (50/113)	Deciding Set Win %	60% (27/45)
94% (597/564)	1st Set Won, Won Match	96% (265/254)
6% (597/33)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	4% (265/11)
17% (155/26)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	30% (56/17)